__________________________
Taking a slightly different tact today as the majority of this post is a shared article about BMI that i am using in its entirety
someone was speaking to me about BMI ----- going on and on about it -- having to get their BMI under 30, etc. etc. and really sounding a tad insecure
I have heard physicians foolishly reference BMI as well --- while being a bit overweight themselves
There are some valid reasons why everyone should just stop it with the BMI utterances. The BMI index is an obscure formula developed in the mid 1800's by a mathematician, not a physician
---- the population has evolved since then --- when the BMI was dreamed up, we were at a place in time where things like malaria , polio, and other things like that could out whole towns and if you got to age 55, you were doing remarkable
Nutrition today is better (well, thats debatable --- but our access to great nutrition is better-- access to garbage calories is also sadly at an all time high too ), bone density is better as a result of the better nutrition , we are living longer as a populace too
My thoughts are that one of the best tools we have available to us to tell us if we are too fat or not is not some chart from an obscure Belgian math whiz from the 1800's -- but its a simple mirror check -
-- my thoughts are that American's in general are the world's best at over-justifying things, --- so if we divulge to some people that the BMI index is a fairy tale, they will sigh a big sigh of relief and say "Awesome, bring on the bacon flavored Frito Lays ! - BMI is bogus !"
Thats not the point at all, --- at a certain point, common sense needs to take over --- but here in North America i am convinced that at least half of us dont have much of that anymore
But Without further adieu, the print below is the actual article , i hope you find it as interesting as i did and i will be back soon with more original and (hopefully) helpful content soon
Thanks again
Doug
Dougmcbride@fitclaimspro.com
________________________________________________________________________________
The BMI Formula
CDC Recommendations:
Americans keep putting on the pounds — at least according to many reports. Studies find that nearly two-thirds of states now have adult obesity rates above 25 percent.
But you may want to take those findings — and your next meal — with a grain of salt, because they're based on a calculation called the body mass index, or BMI.
the body mass index fails on 10 grounds:
1. The person who dreamed up the BMI said explicitly that it could not and should not be used to indicate the level of fatness in an individual.
The BMI was introduced in the early 19th century by a Belgian named Lambert Adolphe Jacques Quetelet. He was a mathematician, not a physician. He produced the formula to give a quick and easy way to measure the degree of obesity of the general population to assist the government in allocating resources. In other words, it is a 200-year-old hack.
2. It is scientifically nonsensical.
There is no physiological reason to square a person's height (Quetelet had to square the height to get a formula that matched the overall data. If you can't fix the data, rig the formula!). Moreover, it ignores waist size, which is a clear indicator of obesity level.
3. It is physiologically wrong.
It makes no allowance for the relative proportions of bone, muscle and fat in the body. But bone is denser than muscle and twice as dense as fat, so a person with strong bones, good muscle tone and low fat will have a high BMI. Thus, athletes and fit, health-conscious movie stars who work out a lot tend to find themselves classified as overweight or even obese.
4. It gets the logic wrong.
The CDC says on its Web site that "the BMI is a reliable indicator of body fatness for people." This is a fundamental error of logic. For example, if I tell you my birthday present is a bicycle, you can conclude that my present has wheels. That's correct logic. But it does not work the other way round. If I tell you my birthday present has wheels, you cannot conclude I got a bicycle. I could have received a car. Because of how Quetelet came up with it, if a person is fat or obese, he or she will have a high BMI. But as with my birthday present, it doesn't work the other way round. A high BMI does not mean an individual is even overweight, let alone obese. It could mean the person is fit and healthy, with very little fat.
5. It's bad statistics.
Because the majority of people today (and in Quetelet's time) lead fairly sedentary lives and are not particularly active, the formula tacitly assumes low muscle mass and high relative fat content. It applies moderately well when applied to such people because it was formulated by focusing on them. But it gives exactly the wrong answer for a large and significant section of the population, namely the lean, fit and healthy. Quetelet is also the person who came up with the idea of "the average man." That's a useful concept, but if you try to apply it to any one person, you come up with the absurdity of a person with 2.4 children. Averages measure entire populations and often don't apply to individuals.
6. It is lying by scientific authority.
Because the BMI is a single number between 1 and 100 (like a percentage) that comes from a mathematical formula, it carries an air of scientific authority. But it is mathematical snake oil.
7. It suggests there are distinct categories of underweight, ideal, overweight and obese, with sharp boundaries that hinge on a decimal place.
That's total nonsense.
8. It makes the more cynical members of society suspect that the medical insurance industry lobbies for the continued use of the BMI to keep their profits high.
Insurance companies sometimes charge higher premiums for people with a high BMI. Among such people are all those fit individuals with good bone and muscle and little fat, who will live long, healthy lives during which they will have to pay those greater premiums.
9. Continued reliance on the BMI means doctors don't feel the need to use one of the more scientifically sound methods that are available to measure obesity levels.
Those alternatives cost a little bit more, but they give far more reliable results.
10. It embarrasses the U.S.
It is embarrassing for one of the most scientifically, technologically and medicinally advanced nations in the world to base advice on how to prevent one of the leading causes of poor health and premature death (obesity) on a 200-year-old numerical hack developed by a mathematician who was not even an expert in what little was known about the human body back then.
